Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:29:43 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: No Observable Twin Paradox in GPS
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <12f133958856eca2ee609a9b86065e97@www.novabbs.com> <m7egu8Fott2U1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-US
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <m7egu8Fott2U1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 14
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:29:44 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1180
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <183b1f04638d6ef4$182256$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1577

On 4/30/2025 1:47 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 30-Apr-25 10:02 am, rhertz wrote:
>> Despite SR being touted as critical for GPS, there's no observable time
>> dilation between two satellites moving at the same speed in opposite
>> directions, as the twin paradox would suggest.
> 
> The issue is not between the rates for different satellites, but for the 
> rates between each satellite and an observer on the ground.

The issue is not about the rates at all.
Time - according to Your absurd religion -
is clock INDICATIONS; one thing about time
it is correct about.