| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<183c462f06432e66$2674258$1813001$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 10:38:43 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Old vs new Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <183c4249950456ab$2875288$1791794$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <l-RVFP4QEWsJLzhC4aNcGcCkeGM@jntp> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <l-RVFP4QEWsJLzhC4aNcGcCkeGM@jntp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 36 Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 08:38:43 +0000 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <183c462f06432e66$2674258$1813001$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> X-Received-Bytes: 2044 On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote: > Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : >> On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >> >> > GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10) >> > so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day >> > to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC. >> >> Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's >> not because your idiot guru has caught God's >> balls, it's because he has inspired you to >> invent a brandly new method of counting time. >> >> Now: as your method is not only brandly new, >> but also utterly idiotic - nobody really >> wants to count time your way. Even you, >> yourself are not really THAT stupid. >> >> And time counted the old way doesn't want to >> dilate. Too bad. > > Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite? > > Because another value wouldn't work. Now - why (1 - 4.4647e-10) instead your SI wannabe standard? That's because your "standard" (and the whole of your "local time" absurd together with it) doesn't work. Common sense has been warning your idiot guru.