Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 23:49:45 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <100keh4$2a7u2$1@dont-email.me> <100vs1t$1cm5u$1@dont-email.me> <BIycnSTIfO9FJa71nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <1010o80$1qbg5$1@dont-email.me> <1012ah5$24c8f$1@dont-email.me> <184327a7ae63d6fa$22739$1966588$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <fDrPHXYQi-MHmOsZ6alw722btpc@jntp> <18432dc866abb785$38685$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <erZc3Js-TcpMn2Qjd5tsOJu_zRA@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <erZc3Js-TcpMn2Qjd5tsOJu_zRA@jntp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 42
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 21:49:46 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2395
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1843321e5bd9ace5$36952$1954103$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2791

On 5/26/2025 10:42 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 26/05/2025 à 22:30, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
>> On 5/26/2025 9:17 PM, Python wrote:
>>> Le 26/05/2025 à 20:38, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
>>>> On 5/26/2025 8:11 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>> Den 26.05.2025 05:47, skrev Julio Di Egidio:
>>>>
>>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Hafele.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Fact:
>>>>> The east going clock left the ground clock when they were
>>>>> synchronous. When it had travelled once around the Earth and
>>>>> was back at the ground clock, the travelling clock was 59 ns
>>>>> younger than the ground clock, and the ground clock was 59 ns
>>>>> older than the travelling clock.
>>>>
>>>> Mo, the fact is that relativistic idiots
>>>> neither know what they're talking about
>>>> nor what clocks are.
>>>
>>> I asked a ‘relativistic idiot’ once how to check if two clocks are in 
>>> synch, I got a sensible answer I implemented in software. Then I 
>>> asked how to adjust them so that they are in synch, then add this to 
>>> my software and it ends up working very well.
>>
>> Well,  their mad religion is forbidding
>> them to adjust clocks and teaching that
>> synchronizing clocks is impossible (except
>> conditions which never happen)
> 
> This is wrong on all aspects

No it is not.


>  From the very formulas in Einstein's and Poincaré's paper I implemented 
> a synchronization checking procedure and a synchronization offset 
> procedure.

A lie, of course. You didn't use light.