| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1848967a19398a29$91265$2042034$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:25:05 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: What is a photon Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity References: <9af3e95b721801ec23446e0d70f081b3@www.novabbs.org> <%5W_P.1199819$lZjd.237071@fx05.ams4> <101hdi1$2104j$1@dont-email.me> <3fe4ff53feee25131897dec6bed26616@www.novabbs.com> <101mlhj$3v6bs$1@dont-email.me> <b3c79148a2a73e05267102dc02069b51@www.novabbs.org> <101pe06$qdb4$1@dont-email.me> <bf5db4fb77db2aa5d2d1d9ec07759e2d@www.novabbs.org> <man762F2uddU1@mid.individual.net> <7684219ed9fcb7ee269061c10326c92d@www.novabbs.org> <masienFtss3U2@mid.individual.net> <1rdrgdh.1myz65p1yygjrzN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <mav29hFda1gU3@mid.individual.net> <102f8cr$2rudm$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <102f8cr$2rudm$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 38 Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:25:06 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2022 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <1848967a19398a29$91265$2042034$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> On 6/12/2025 9:11 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > Den 12.06.2025 06:12, skrev Thomas Heger: >> >> Velocity IS frame-dependent! >> >> This is inevitable and also the case for light. > > No. > It is experimentally confirmed A lie. that the speed of light in vacuum > is invariant Even your idiot guru was unable to stick to this absurd for a long time and his GR shit had to withdraw from it. , which means that it is the same in all inertial > frames of reference. A lie again, it doesn't mean that. > https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf > https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1913.pdf > https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf > https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf > https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf > > This is what all the cranks in this forum fail to understand. We do understand, you're an incredibly stupid piece of fanatic, lying shit, and so are your fellow cultists.