Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 20:20:10 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <bee82c477b86c0caf1c30da405ed870f@www.novabbs.com> <10140pm$2huu3$1@dont-email.me> <211597acf09cc21af2125ea3c9fe12d4@www.novabbs.com> <101acbb$188t$1@dont-email.me> <a18977a79cf92b54c28e3e65395ab113@www.novabbs.com> <101cpl6$isnr$1@dont-email.me> <1844830cac6ece08$164805$1966588$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <844a0d83caeacd8dae32487821889fb8@www.novabbs.com> <goH_P.892794$BFJ.19100@fx13.ams4> <1844b1dd9110820c$262985$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <fd67be5bdeeb7f9a15ebd084a809f800@www.novabbs.com> <101h830$1vsbc$1@dont-email.me> <5dfed512171a25be1a5999aef8254b63@www.novabbs.com> <101q7ns$11418$1@dont-email.me> <1845f53bbba17f85$13863$2064386$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <ad5488fff61bbd416908a5948b7c9d43@www.novabbs.com> <102rm7s$2cg9r$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <102rm7s$2cg9r$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 21
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 18:20:10 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2144
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1849e772d8cbebed$192388$2064386$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>

On 6/17/2025 2:21 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
> Den 16.06.2025 23:42, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>> On 6/4/2025 9:51 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> GR is a consistent, falsifiable theory.
> 
>> Paul doesn't understand that part of the scientific method is the
>> derivation. For the derivation to be correct, it must be not only
>> mathematically and logically consistent and falsifiable but also have a
>> rational physics basis. One cannot add the effects of refraction to
>> those of gravity to double the deflection by claiming a wave-particle
>> duality unless you're a loon.
> 
> According to GR the formula for gravitational deflection of
> EM-radiation by the Sun is:
>   θ = (2GM/(AU⋅c²))⋅((1+cosφ)/sinφ)

A lie, according to your GR shit light
[in vacuum] takes always straight/
geodesic paths.