Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:01:27 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <18718dcf59ba6124292be6ad69ad86da@www.novabbs.com>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3ed9d78af41ee6880cf864a02867213a@www.novabbs.com> <17f0d033eac8edc8$659867$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <c463fa40bd9ebe67a28a3f67fbe4bd0d@www.novabbs.com> <17f104cd0b589946$703498$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <67a18da1faafc11d9c43ca7a3c70e83a@www.novabbs.com> <17f1204753363f43$787953$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <010185743472f88026ab5d16bebeb138@www.novabbs.com> <17f15425ee3f65e2$738907$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <464e58fd5cf0adade768dea54834dc1b@www.novabbs.com> <17f176a4eb8ff766$767273$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <60b546aefd374704997ad2afdda4b868@www.novabbs.com> <17f1cbd25b8ccb92$723810$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <82fa9dba5da254b0ae80624710a69a40@www.novabbs.com> <17f21c123547c9b1$886433$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1054204"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$dJ3.bf0aoCKIbgpZdAk2/.Ft6nm/1npJfuIR2K55wgP7GP7TA0btG
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 4165
Lines: 67

On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 17:54:29 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 19:37, gharnagel pisze:
>
> > On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 17:23:56 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > Harrie, clocks which are not - exist only
> > > in your moronic gedanken delusions. In
> > > the real world - every clock ever was
> > > engineered.
> >
> > Mendacious Maciej prevaricates again by deleting part of
> > my response.  This is LYING.
>
> No, this is selecting,

Selecting?  That's a euphemism for what Wozzie-liar does.
What Wozzie-liar does is lying by omission.

"Lying by omission is the deliberate act of leaving out
important details so the truth is skewed or misrepresented."

Wozzie-liar does this continually and knowingly.

> and mendacious Gary is doing the same, always.

Wozzie-liar is projecting his own rank dishonesty and
furthering his mendacity for claiming I'm being untruthful.

What I say may not always be correct, but I'm describing
what's implied by Wozzie-liar's behavior.  Although he may
vociferously deny it, it is most likely true.

Wozzie-liar KNOWS he's not telling the truth.  He is a
congenital liar.  Actually, he also has some of the traits
of a pathological liar, too:

https://tagvault.org/blog/pathological-liar-vs-compulsive-liar-vs-congenital-liar/

> > > Any number? No. More insults? Yes.

Just the title Wozzie-liar named this thread is a monumental
insult and slander.  Wozzie-liar is a congenital slanderer.

> > Wozzie-burning-butt is so-o-o anxious to misdirect from the big
>
> Any number? No. More insults? Yes.Of course.
> Lies still have short legs.

More dishonesty from Wozzie-liar.  The correct answer is
NOT a number, and he deleted that answer because it was
inconvenient for his mendacious schemes.

The lying Weasel Wozniak's words belie the fact that normal
clocks are NOT engineered to run slow, "selecting" not to
include "to run slow."  Just more dishonesty from Wozzie-
liar.

“How much better would life be if a liar’s pants really
did catch fire? -- Rebel Circus

If they did, Wozzie's butt would be a giant blaze.

Wozzie-burning-butt is so-o-o anxious to misdirect from the big
elefink in the room; namely, his total dishonesty.  He deletes
a correct answer to his question, which I was not obligated to
answer anyway because his questions are meant to cover the
truth with merde (pardon my French).