| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1UJOcSAxNDEKT6JSvPp3cCEB39g@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <1UJOcSAxNDEKT6JSvPp3cCEB39g@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD! References: <7f48b61d2779066c75b739a1afd4eb80@www.novabbs.com> <vd0t61$3lvnd$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: 1zuAc6QVuHSwa7WO7kkRhX92W8A JNTP-ThreadID: 7f48b61d2779066c75b739a1afd4eb80@www.novabbs.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=1UJOcSAxNDEKT6JSvPp3cCEB39g@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Wed, 25 Sep 24 16:39:49 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-09-25T16:39:49Z/9036336"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> Bytes: 3429 Lines: 43 Le 25/09/2024 à 13:46, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : > Den 25.09.2024 00:25, skrev rhertz: >> >> The most evident proof about that relativity is a PSEUDOSCIENCE is the >> infamous "twin paradox", which occupied time and words of (otherwise) >> bright minds exposed to relativism since 1910. >> This is not a pseudo-science, it is an absolutely correct science. It is simply extremely poorly explained by relativistic physicists and mathematicians, who do not understand anything about it at all and only pose equations that are half true and half false. To=(x/c).sqrt(1+2c²/ax) is true. D'=D.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²) is false. The contraction of distances is totally inappropriate. They think (and I never understood how they can make such a mistake as the bad contraction of distances observed by a neutral observer of Stella's frame of reference, that is to say at an equal distance from the elements of the entire inertial universe of Terrence) that it is equal to D'=D.sqrt(1-v²/c²) . This is not the contraction observed by Stella, and the 12 ly do not transform into 7.2 ly FOR HER. We must use the equation D'=D.sqrt(1-v²/c²)/(1+cosµ.v/c) We then see that if µ is different from 0 the result is mind-blowing. However, Stella does not move transversely (or rather the earth transversely in relation to her), but longitudinally. We have cosµ=1 on the way out and cosµ=-1 on the way back. If we forget this simple and logical geometry, everything enters into mathematical horror, and no one understands anything anymore. It even becomes impossible to explain how Stella can see the earth moving away at 0.4444c on the way out, then come back to it at 4c on the way back, in a journey that will last twice 9 years of her own time. This is not a pseudo-science, it is an absolutely correct science. It is simply extremely poorly explained by relativistic physicists and mathematicians, who do not understand anything about it at all and only pose equations that are half true and half false. All sprinkled with an immense sense of arrogance. R.H.