Article <1WtCff6_rqltbeqcBsoo9BvDMqg@jntp>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <1WtCff6_rqltbeqcBsoo9BvDMqg@jntp>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<1WtCff6_rqltbeqcBsoo9BvDMqg@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <1WtCff6_rqltbeqcBsoo9BvDMqg@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic synchronisation method
References: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp> <lsati1FireqU1@mid.individual.net> <kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp>
 <lscd99FrdlmU1@mid.individual.net> <nbIKxzcTXKviqKHe3MOYkBQMjII@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: FKQUKWgdvAMfHrzT3yRO34aeBho
JNTP-ThreadID: YYnLTqUhhEGH779uk7wevDN2vH4
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=1WtCff6_rqltbeqcBsoo9BvDMqg@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 24 16:42:06 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="a2db72c04f585d06cf196654fdd975ff3059d93b"; logging-data="2024-12-17T16:42:06Z/9145041"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com>
Bytes: 2045
Lines: 16

Le 17/12/2024 à 11:45, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
...
> As for his method of synchronization, it is just two lines to explain that 
> tA'-tA=2AB/c (which is true) and therefore that tB-tA=tA'-tB=AB/c but by omitting 
> to say WHO takes the measurement of that, that is to say by believing that it is 
> everyone.


Not at all. There is NO ambiguity. tA and t'A are measured by clock A (for 
events that happen there), tB is measured by clock B (for an event that 
happens there too).

And, obvisously, the fact that "clock X measure tX for an event happening 
there" is the same fact for everyone. Only fools of your kind can pretend 
that 1 + 1 = 3 for some observers.