Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <1a3716fc1a1d62f9f44396ca12f8a9e129864573.camel@gmail.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1a3716fc1a1d62f9f44396ca12f8a9e129864573.camel@gmail.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 07:23:11 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 521
Message-ID: <1a3716fc1a1d62f9f44396ca12f8a9e129864573.camel@gmail.com>
References: <vdgpbs$2nmcm$1@dont-email.me> <vdvfki$1e78r$1@dont-email.me>
	 <db4ba1c99ee737853f685719877d3b295f887e91@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve0j03$1n4d9$2@dont-email.me>
	 <8f8f81ca09cc2a36481999e0408ff2e3ca780f39@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve1p1i$1s2mq$1@dont-email.me>
	 <085a1c3ee93ae5388d60b4b195fdb7a0b1ae70ed@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve1r9p$1t0bn$1@dont-email.me>
	 <ade7b09486ca9de753a35f88aa4540c0233df3dd@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve2038$1tdjm$1@dont-email.me>
	 <56b830364cf651238ea19749c6dda753427cf8fb@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve21rv$1tm6t$1@dont-email.me>
	 <4ead3c7dcd0cb13a6c655716f106bb836aa4bc47@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve39fd$26g97$1@dont-email.me>
	 <030f6c2bf84dc1776787d597adcf5c2015cc861d@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve3e3r$26g97$4@dont-email.me>
	 <8c474bc7aee03e8eedb712f48c4b39c1c9e88a7b@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve3gb8$27ad7$1@dont-email.me>
	 <243d02f2d3397e7f681ebdad2e9b7d8a346bb75c@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve405a$29pn2$1@dont-email.me>
	 <a8e26927fd1751a23d0e4fc4e68a912628bd63da@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve473a$2afp6$1@dont-email.me>
	 <37c291e02299479ab8b55256f3744fe0ba48f6db@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve4e64$2bp17$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 01:23:13 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fafd51d8166b5869e9175a9ccb64f709";
	logging-data="2479475"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+pBTtOAfEh8K8DUfE0NRa3"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WQcwuiEQDCuB2RQn7VAE2hbAXPk=
In-Reply-To: <ve4e64$2bp17$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 26695

On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 18:10 -0500, olcott wrote:
> On 10/8/2024 4:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > On 10/8/24 5:10 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > On 10/8/2024 3:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > On 10/8/24 3:11 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > On 10/8/2024 12:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > On 10/8/24 10:41 AM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > On 10/8/2024 9:10 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 10/8/24 10:03 AM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 10/8/2024 8:21 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 10/8/24 8:44 AM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 10/8/2024 6:51 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/24 9:28 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/2024 8:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/24 8:58 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/2024 7:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/24 7:36 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/2024 6:04 PM, Richard Damon wrote=
:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/24 6:57 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/2024 5:39 PM, Richard Damon w=
rote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/24 8:08 AM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/2024 6:02 AM, Richard Dam=
on wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/24 10:05 PM, olcott wro=
te:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/2024 8:29 PM, Richard=
 Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/24 8:05 PM, olcott =
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/2024 5:36 PM, Ric=
hard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/24 3:05 PM, olc=
ott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/2024 1:52 PM,=
 Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/24 2:32 PM,=
 olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/2024 1:13=
 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/24 2:03=
 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/2024 =
12:29 PM, Richard Damon
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/24 =
1:07 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/2=
024 11:59 AM, Richard Damon
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6=
/24 8:39 AM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DDD e=
mulated by each
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > corre=
sponding HHH=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that =
can possibly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exist=
 never returns. Each of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > these=
 HHH=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emula=
tors that does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > retur=
n 0 correctly reports the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > above=
=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > non- =
halting behavior.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, the=
 DDD return (if the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HHH(DDD=
)=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gives a=
n answer), just after the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HHH=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that em=
ulated them gave up.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DDD emula=
ted by each corresponding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HHH=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that can =
possibly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exist nev=
er returns.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DDD emula=
ted by each corresponding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HHH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DDD emula=
ted by each corresponding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HHH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DDD emula=
ted by each corresponding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HHH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DDD emula=
ted by each corresponding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HHH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which, as y=
ou have been told but seems
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be above yo=
ur head means that the=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > execution o=
f DDD,=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gets to ignor=
e the fact that DDD was=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > defined to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have a pathol=
ogical relationship with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HHH=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HHH cannot ig=
nore.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, that isn't =
ignoring it, but taking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > account that si=
nce HHH is defined to be a=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > specific progra=
m, it has specific
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behavior.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The behavior of t=
he executed DDD after the=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emulated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DDD has already b=
een aborted is different=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > than the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behavior of the e=
mulated DDD that must be=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aborted.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope, it is the exa=
ct same code on the exact=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same data, and thus=
 does the exact same=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behavior.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The execution trace p=
roves that the executed=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DDD has
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different behavior th=
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========