Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Relativity Mafia
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:25:12 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <1b4ef5dda41326607da790d275327b2d@www.novabbs.com>
References: <a286e4c1a77753568151f1184e1d8e47@www.novabbs.com> <ee3c60b588f3bce0e15a548cf115bf85@www.novabbs.com> <bb9df963b38c602b698971db98d0dd9c@www.novabbs.com> <345893bac4b67219938a7b06e34a63b7@www.novabbs.com> <z92cnb7o0oWdkNf6nZ2dnZfqnPjcy52d@giganews.com> <9b0dc1590136ac6bd5da1916cd673ec3@www.novabbs.com> <G6ednXwxfr6VR9H6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3846181"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$AGxTk/QLnWC09AgslcoqaOc0WGR0eAt7/ptDZ7J3Xg.JIYLkGw882
Bytes: 3413
Lines: 50

On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 21:49:39 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

> On 12/01/2024 01:33 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:50:19 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/29/2024 10:08 AM, Bertietaylor wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:58:53 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie: I haven't connected with Arindam due to his claims about
>>>>> ultimate realities. He probably thinks light is affected by gravity and
>>>>> I don't.
>>>>
>>>> You are right and Arindam will agree totally with you for he has proved
>>>> that gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon.
>>>>
>>>> Bertietaylor
>>>
>>> Heaviside and crew arrived at that action in the electrical field
>>> was just a bit _beyond_ c, I suppose one might say, the "mass-less".
>> It seems we may be able to have energy without mass.
>
> Well yeah, energy is just whatever is potential,
> yet, there's no energy without entelechy.
>
> That said, various derivations like when electromagnetism
> arrives at an edge speed higher than c, in meters per second,
> got no problems on their own after their own constructivistic
> account.
>
>
> A tetrad of quantities like mass/charge/lifetime/velocity,
> about you'll notice four particles like neutron/electron/proton/photon,
> about four forces like strong, electrical, weak, electroweak,
> and four fields for those four forces,
> and often in linear accounts a trio of the free one the fixed,
> has that theories like GR have one or two of those, while QM
> sort of billiard-balls them all together, then without
> having another "element" like "ether", for space,
> or a projection of prediction, for time,
> have it so that a sort of tetra of quantities is
> then arrived at as "energy", everywhere, connected,
> "entelechy" everywhere, it's called "continuity law
> a stronger than conservation law".
>
>
> You can emulate the particle physicists and just put
> "photons" everywhere doing whatever you say.
>
> It's not considered very conscientious, ....
Since water is potentially solid, liquid, or gas, but actually only one
of these at a time, couldn't energy exist without matter?