Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Schwarzschild Metric has been refuted.
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 21:16:42 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <1c52210d7a8daf1d1677131b5171aa9f@www.novabbs.com>
References: <c5b55811f1d9185c218d02d03bc8e44b@www.novabbs.com> <8ea3ce221fabb79b4549bca9ff6d787e@www.novabbs.com> <vuj8n9$2v3o2$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2021794"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$QU7dCCt6PD88NwGSGDpi.OmFDZ0F7BQxqKJf6deV27wFnNE6YU/Y6
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 3326
Lines: 51

On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 18:35:26 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 25.04.2025 20:55, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> SCIREA Journal of Physics
>> ISSN: 2706-8862
>> http://www.scirea.org/journal/Physics
>> March 24, 2022
>> Volume 7, Issue 1, February 2022
>> https://doi.org/10.54647/physics14417
>> "Using the Newton’s Theory of Gravity to Calculate the
>> Deflection of Light in the Solar System and the Orbital
>> Poles of Light’s Motion of General Relativity"
>
> https://article.scirea.org/pdf/14417.pdf
>
> I quote from the Introduction:
> "The calculations of general relativity assumed that the light
>   passes across the solar surface, which was equivalent to assume
>   that the solar radius was a root of the cubic equation. It is
>   proved in this paper that the solar radius can not be the orbital
>   poles of light. The orbital poles of light were located in the solar
>   interior not far from the solar center, so the light from stars in
>   outer space would be lost in the solar interior and could not be
>   observed by the observers on the earth. The night sky on the earth
>   would be starless."
>
>   Mei Xiaochun actually claims that according to GR, the light from
>   all the stars in outer space should be sucked into the Sun so
>   no stars would be visible from the Earth!
>
> Laurence Clark Crossen, how did you manage to fail to see
> that Mei Xiaochun's paper is meaningless drivel?
>
> Well done! :-D
>
>
> https://paulba.no/pdf/GravitationalDeflection.pdf
> https://paulba.no/Deflection.html
> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
As usual, you misconstrue willfully and stupidly.
That is why your take on it is meaningless drivel.
He has clearly stated that the GR assumptions in the Schwarzschild
metric involve starlight passing through the center of the Sun.
You have not disproved his case for that.
It won't suffice for you to thumb your nose at criticisms of relativity.
Are you a Sinophobe?
Your reply sucks.
You are incompetent at defending relativity as usual.