Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly
 met
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:28:23 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <1d83d93f3e43c27a2c029200d2199444fedf52fa@i2pn2.org>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvochv$15td$2@news.muc.de>
	<vvodn5$3na6l$3@dont-email.me>
	<1276edeb9893085c59b02bbbd59fe2c64011736b@i2pn2.org>
	<vvqk4s$gldn$12@dont-email.me> <vvqln4$g8ck$5@dont-email.me>
	<vvrftj$ndkg$1@dont-email.me> <vvrima$nejb$3@dont-email.me>
	<vvua3t$1hm37$1@dont-email.me>
	<cd36dcf87daefa9ae472cc426d57704c2baa4292@i2pn2.org>
	<10000hl$1v330$1@dont-email.me> <1000c4g$21dtc$2@dont-email.me>
	<1000ps6$24gr3$1@dont-email.me> <1000qd3$24jh0$1@dont-email.me>
	<1000r3j$24gr3$5@dont-email.me> <1000sa5$24sr2$2@dont-email.me>
	<1000skj$24gr3$9@dont-email.me> <1000t6r$24sr2$5@dont-email.me>
	<1000tbh$24gr3$12@dont-email.me> <100100k$29e7u$2@dont-email.me>
	<ee7015d55d1b71642a631530d0f4d3c52dafed9a@i2pn2.org>
	<1002bgq$2i4bk$5@dont-email.me>
	<f0ebaa2bcf8550ddd66196c23e3b15182ea21045@i2pn2.org>
	<1002o7g$2kb74$5@dont-email.me> <1002p0r$2k04c$3@dont-email.me>
	<1002pcg$2l877$2@dont-email.me> <1002q7i$2k04c$4@dont-email.me>
	<1002qfi$2le74$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:28:23 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="289662"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2419
Lines: 14

Am Wed, 14 May 2025 14:21:22 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 5/14/2025 2:17 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 14/05/2025 20:02, olcott wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2025 1:56 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> 
>>>> Asked to publish, you didn't publish.

> I am not going to publish a private email you freaking nitwit.
> I published the words that he agreed to as I said that I did in the
> linked paper.
Yeah, so you don't have proof.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.