Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH --- Correct Emulation Defined
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 07:00:23 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <1de7234bcf7e535c57fb0369d16f9a1af3573fa7@i2pn2.org>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:00:23 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="980394"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2028
Lines: 29

On 3/19/25 10:32 PM, olcott wrote:
> 
> DDD()
> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
> [00002173] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp  ; housekeeping
> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
> [0000217f] 83c404     add  esp,+04
> [00002182] 5d         pop  ebp
> [00002183] c3         ret
> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
> 
> When N steps of DDD are emulated by HHH according
> to the semantics of the x86 language then these
> N steps are emulated correctly.
> 

Right, The N Steps of DDD were emulated correctly, but not the WHOLE of 
DDD, that wasn't correctly emulated.

Again, you confuse two different things and call them the same.

By your logic, if you get off a highway at the first exit, and thus can 
say for certain that it didn't end in that first streach, that the full 
road which continued on from there, must never end anywhere.


Sorry, you are just proving you know you are committing FRAUD by lying 
about your definitions.