Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 20:56:20 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <1f71496841d33e33c17081dab4e92631@www.novabbs.com>
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <vsh92t$3mltr$1@dont-email.me> <d6b9dd687bfe1c27ced89d9c3657a2f5@www.novabbs.com> <vsj1ic$1bsmo$4@dont-email.me> <bde61d4704e1b6144732c8f6cf68e021@www.novabbs.com> <vslh71$52m4$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3003442"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$goiuQ39L.0lbLaDUjDHxh.oZZe7eM2xVEieiNMu7oK15SZ2bhn7JS
Bytes: 2507
Lines: 32

On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 8:39:24 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 02.04.2025 23:33, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:00:04 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Den 01.04.2025 21:06, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>>> It's easy to understand that the lifetime of the muons is longer and
>>>> that time dilation is an illogical fiction divorced from physics.
>>>
>>> The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
>>> The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
>>>
>>> These are measured facts!
>>>
>>> You claim this is easy to understand without using SR,
>>> so please explain why muons live longer when they are moving.
>
>> Paul, I do not know why they live longer. I know time dilation is
>> fiction. Surely, they can't go faster than light. Heaven forbid!
>
> The measured FACTS are:
> The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
> The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
>
> Do you really not understand how ridiculous it is to claim
> that these facts do not exist because you "know" they can't exist?
>
> You don't know the difference between science and religion.
>
> You _believe_ SR is nonsense, and ignore facts to keep your faith.
>
Time dilation is an illogical interpretation.
That they live longer is an interpretation that is scientific.