| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1hWdnX25WJyjKP31nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 03:38:37 +0000 Newsgroups: sci.math X-Mozilla-News-Host: snews://giganews.com:443 From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Subject: The Circles Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 20:38:16 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1hWdnX25WJyjKP31nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 30 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-5gLWDMSzENynTNPnJl41pHO6kHDmdEjBS6p4aSBWTksV/l0biQuWmNW674lJ0bydy/qMXwVnR/qUwq/!NzicjaGJqbnBVNxqU++rFEWYoISeE1iBQ4u4Xg/q47XskNNPDJMXp2dfPZwF5RpCrIFzxQ8Tl7kh X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Oh, been a while, figure I'll post. Watching a speech of Dr. Woodin the other day, sort of like, "well Scott keeps generalizing his theorem and our closed bounded universes if you don't mind me calling the cumulative hierarchy that, sort of make that large cardinals sort of reiterate and I'm not sure whether a large supercompact cardinal is going to read right when the ordinary inductive set has neither compactness nor is it extra-ordinarily super, while we're calling Cohen's method blueprints now and really that's Skolem when in model relativization we're pretty sure we can't add any axioms without them confounding each other". And it's like, try less axioms, arrive at the extra-ordinary immediately and resolve the paradoxes up front, since there are at least three different rulial regularities the foundness, ordering, and dispersion, otherwise you're not going to have a good time, and yes that's provable. Watching some Dr. Tao, "me and my mental collaborators are really pretty happy about being able to divide-and-conquer proofs, though one may aver that the implicits in the derivation aren't included in the usual sort of dimensionless analysis, as that with regards to the general awe of Breen-Deligne, we've sort of neglected quadratic reciprocity". So, "foundations", on the one hand, and "number theorems", on the other, both sort of seem needing some ways to look at them, a little different, to help that otherwise there's "the circles" and "the going around in the circles".