Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1k99rjdlu3nojs2r0525pq21j4qc3h9jb2@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: To sum up
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:29:58 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 66
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <1k99rjdlu3nojs2r0525pq21j4qc3h9jb2@4ax.com>
References: <vo1kt4$2r8m5$1@dont-email.me> <vo1n39$2rdv4$1@dont-email.me> <vo47ib$3cm8h$1@dont-email.me> <vo7jg5$2090$1@dont-email.me> <vo7kt0$qvu$2@dont-email.me> <voovjr$3o3ri$1@dont-email.me> <vop70b$3sjqq$2@dont-email.me> <ndr0rj1m7bp2r4erpms6mcpquunmu4k9d0@4ax.com> <vov55a$13r1b$1@dont-email.me> <k8j8rj5t9n9b91c9q4qo25tiij5jbg7ti0@4ax.com> <vp1kc3$1kvce$1@dont-email.me> <upl8rjpg2luq1h0ch9bhv7sqelepba4t2e@4ax.com> <vp1o58$1lhpq$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="68357"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:91sY4E8BuZvAx0Bkt+PUrzAkfag=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id E5A3622978C; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:30:12 -0500 (EST)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800F1229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:30:10 -0500 (EST)
	by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 51IFU4c5661895
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:30:04 +0100
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69CA460617
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/69CA460617; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buzz.off
	id 37774DC01CA; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:30:02 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:30:01 +0100 (CET)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+otW11NhZvYNT2CFEFSS2ldMFKirj3IP3qcNQEN86Mpah48RkagR7k
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 5303

On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:41:42 +1100, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com>:

>On 18/02/2025 8:55 pm, Martin Harran wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:37:06 +1100, MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 18/02/2025 8:15 pm, Martin Harran wrote:
>>>> The question I would like to see you address is how your Intelligent
>>>> Designer might have gone about this.
>>>>
>>>> The human brain indeed has unique characteristics in terms of its
>>>> ability and functions. Other species do not have those
>>>> characteristics, but they do have similar brain structures and, as
>>>> Ernest has pointed out in several examples, those brains can sometimes
>>>> be argued to be even more complex than the human one. So how do you
>>>> think your Intelligent Designer went about this? Did he play around
>>>> with various prototype brain designs on other species and then come up
>>>> with a particular design that he decided to give to humans alone?
>>>
>>> Why the hostile, mocking tone,
>> 
>> Not meant to be either hostile or mocking but I accept it may come
>> across that way due to my frustration with you continually refusing to
>> deal with issues raided by a fellow religious believer. [1]
>> 
>>> and straw man depiction of God?
>> 
>> It is you and your fellow IDers who have created a strawman by
>> pretending to talk about some anodyne designer when you really mean
>> God; and not just *any* God, the specific Christian God.
>
>I'm with many ID proponents who are openly Christians, but in the 
>context of debating the interpretation and implications of scientific 
>evidence, deliberately and correctly refer only to a non-specific 
>intelligent designer interacting with this material world from outside 
>of spacetime.
>
>> 
>> 
>> ===========================
>> 
>> [1] For example, still waiting for you to produce the evidence you
>> promised 10 days ago about ID gaining traction.
>> 
Same here.
>
>It'll come, I'm still doing midnighters. And distracting myself with 
>posts like these.
>
So, "The check is in the mail"?

Either you know of such evidence or you were blowing smoke.
If the former, a simple one-line cite to the evidence would
have taken less time than the two sentences above. But I
suspect it's actually the latter; simply the most recent in
a long line of such from various ID apologists.
>
-- 

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov