Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Perfect clocks
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:09:07 +0200
Organization: De Ster
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <1qsmp8o.1jwlg3v1xk01r5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References: <17c9cc22cd9fce30$68$255119$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Reply-To: jjlax32@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:09:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a4eb3f2cf27d6dc45df72a56119fc674";
	logging-data="4063993"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Gqntz/4ACwJ4u551eC+4Ye86suv7GUBo="
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:txR2EKD+sow+7vgY6soNgRxWRy4=
Bytes: 1152

Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:

> More stable, more independent on the environment
> and its fancies a device is - better it is.
> Perfect clocks would ignore the nature completely.

Au contraire, perfect clocks are perfect nature,

Jan