Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 11:50:59 +0200
Organization: De Ster
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <1qso30i.hyqy7pf46wb5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References: <uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me> <e7b18fbbd25aef1edf75d3fd7baa053a@www.novabbs.com>
Reply-To: jjlax32@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 11:50:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c95e331bfec6b9a6d3956907999ab341";
	logging-data="332126"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Isjme7XuJzFK3zwpLVgRoqYcL8uRA9lc="
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kn2N21vf9m5zmFkFW8OAICcbtI8=
Bytes: 1755

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force does
> NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely theoretical.
> My evidence is experimental.

Correct, merely experimental.
It stands falsified by a reliable theory.

FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand
do conserve energy-momentum.
If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you 
to tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
and how these equations must be modified.

As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,

Jan

-- 
"No experimental result should be believed until it has been confirmed
by a reliable theory"    (Arthur Eddington)