Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<1qsvg5a.x7fj8618ybjpgN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Scalar waves Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 09:46:08 +0200 Organization: De Ster Lines: 41 Message-ID: <1qsvg5a.x7fj8618ybjpgN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> References: <l96663F16l9U1@mid.individual.net> <Me6dnRr7rMaN6rP7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <l98megFchp8U1@mid.individual.net> <TeednX5uuvbrPbL7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <l9bfe7FpedoU1@mid.individual.net> Reply-To: jjlax32@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder) Injection-Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 09:46:09 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0245d71f97bff03c8b1fd0aeae3f1060"; logging-data="3207803"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vBFYb/ACJPwO62BbRDMX7v/aAGRYFIrU=" User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6) Cancel-Lock: sha1:qTTBg0nf2A0cHe9zjXI3f0nEfWg= Bytes: 2263 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am Montag000029, 29.04.2024 um 15:28 schrieb Ross Finlayson: > > >> > > > > > > It's rather as there's a physical constant. > > > > It's 1.0. In natural units, it's infinity. > > > > Or, there's a physical constant. > > > > It's infinity. In natural units, it's 1.0. > > > I don't like this 'c=1 thing', because 1 is a natural number, while > speed/velocity have physical dimensions with v = dx/dt. > > Because time and distance are not measured with the same units, c had to > have units. You really need to work on your misunderstandings about units and dimensions. In particular, physical quantities do not -have- a dimension. Conversely dimension is not a property of physical quantity. You cannot measure a dimension. Dimensions are human constructs that can be assigned arbitrarily, limited only by the need to be consistent about it. You cannot deduce anything from a clash of dimensions beyond the undeniable fact that you have made a mistake. > Now 1 has no units whatsoever (because it is just a number) you cannot > say, that c is one. Of course you can, and people (who know better than you) do it all the time. Jan