Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 20:16:52 +0200
Organization: De Ster
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <1qsxtwb.1nvopds1cjzae2N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References: <uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me> <e7b18fbbd25aef1edf75d3fd7baa053a@www.novabbs.com> <1qso30i.hyqy7pf46wb5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <v0limi$12erm$1@dont-email.me> <1qsqfo1.13w3szaq4r4yrN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <b446446ee35091021f3ec3f5d6567957@www.novabbs.com>
Reply-To: jjlax32@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 20:16:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a7ce07c338ebb84088423be093f43eaa";
	logging-data="12758"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18byvTnjB4/aD7EkwwzSiA1ohA+oD79IoA="
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HqTtc6Lno11I1u1WkBv6tdNde2Y=
Bytes: 2717

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

> J. J. Lodder wrote:
> 
> > Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >> On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> >> > bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >>
> >> >> That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force
> does
> >> >> NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely
> theoretical.
> >> >> My evidence is experimental.
> >> > 
> >> > Correct, merely experimental.
> >> > It stands falsified by a reliable theory.
> >> > 
> >> > FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand
> >> > do conserve energy-momentum.
> >> > If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you
> >> > to tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
> >> > and how these equations must be modified.
> >> > 
> >> > As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent 
> >> violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the 
> >> electromagnetic field.
> 
> > If the momentum is carried away by the electromagnetic fiel
> > there is still momentum conservation.
> > And photon drive really isn't a new idea.
> > However, it suffers from the unpleasant fact
> > that  c = 300 megawatt/newton, in slightly unconventional units.
> 
> Arindam's work has nothing to do with photon drives. 

No, of course not. Photon drives realy work,
Arindam's things don't.

Jan