| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1r6cu9i.1ntjwbe162y4nmN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Donuts Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:57:54 +0000 Organization: Poppy Records Lines: 59 Message-ID: <1r6cu9i.1ntjwbe162y4nmN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> References: <a7n7ojljjer6nmeatlk14k2sl0rlvljebm@4ax.com> <7jn7ojt1cb3h3dcvp4h3mrrtotcbif97fo@4ax.com> <67894c92$4$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6l5jojheair1ati2erpl634ubdsa2hkd5i@4ax.com> <678af59f$0$3620713$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <rs2nojd8936be0ra6vbjt6tto7jk392npf@4ax.com> X-Trace: individual.net hEPgtDl3UQrqT7fTpFR0hA/CcxnN+WpW5vuZve8QAoRoocZH9b X-Orig-Path: liz Cancel-Lock: sha1:YnGcGWbRxGdXT8OgPUuddvT+v6M= sha256:vM4DEABolMlGXdAZXRGVay1PPXffO0gUwhVazjUFmBc= User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4.6 Bytes: 3261 Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:28:15 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: > > >On 1/16/2025 6:31 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote: > >> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 13:16:05 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: > >> > >>> On 1/12/2025 10:40 AM, john larkin wrote: > >>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:19:22 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I find when I really need to focus on something particularly > >>>>> recondite, it's impossible without access to copious quantities of > >>>>> strong coffee and donuts. Just wondering if anyone else here has the > >>>>> same problem and if so, which brand of donuts works best? > >>>> > >>>> Problem? What problem? > >>>> > >>>> But dark chocolate is a superior design tool. > >>>> > >>>> We don't have any Dunkin Donuts around here > >>> > >>> Their coffee is wretched, I should know I grew up with one on every > >>> corner, sometimes eight of them in a three mile stretch of road. > >>> > >>> It seems to be a lot of New Englander's favorite drink for some reason, > >>> I'm guessing it's the caffeine that's the best part not the rest of it. > >> > >> It's even worse than Starbucks and that's saying something. > > > >Abusers of the chain here tend to get it served "regular" which means > >like a quarter-cup of cream and half-dozen sugars so who cares what it > >tastes like naturally I guess. > > > >Just a $5 generic house-brand bag of Peruvian dark roast through a Mr. > >Coffee is better for more civilized use...the UK surely has us beat on > >tea but there is little excuse for drinking bad coffee in the Americas.. > > Last time I donned a stab-proof vest and visited the UK, there was a > coffee joint about every 10 yards and some of them served far more > varieties of coffee than tea. There's only a couple of teas to choose > from but over a dozen coffees. It's an outrage. We've had a few centuries in which to rationalise our tea blending so that purveyors only need to supply a small range: Builder's tea Afternoon tea Gnats' p*ss As-it-comes In contrast that foreign Johnny-come-lately, coffee, is still relatively immature and in a state of flux (probably caused by stirring it too vigorously). -- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk