| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1radyge.j7ir4s197bs3kN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Valve frequency multipliers (followup) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 20:56:43 +0100 Organization: Poppy Records Lines: 52 Message-ID: <1radyge.j7ir4s197bs3kN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> References: <1rabxmc.1b5yjg6mfg554N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <l6b5vj976mp5edrpq2u11tsavi0e8fba9k@4ax.com> <1radt4i.15mvdgcbfasocN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <umj5vj1ful1knrbm99utvhsd5m215p4btn@4ax.com> X-Trace: individual.net d4uRTOs2sGO23LnIRPj1FwuozphA2DI/6xY+GCW/Epox0cscA3 X-Orig-Path: liz Cancel-Lock: sha1:XvtY/fA9nV/FV3tb9Bx7GDYpBlk= sha256:tvnLwUQvC5RwoNh2kU/4Z08PKHB35VViBfoqsR34yLo= User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4.6 Bytes: 2999 john larkin <jlArbor.com> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 19:12:08 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid > (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: [...] > >The formers were some NOS ones that had about 40 turns of wire on them, > >bfeore I stripped them and wound on 7 turns for 50 Mc/s. That looks as > >though they were originally intended to work somewhere around 1 Mc/s and > >presumably the ferrite core would have been optimised for that frequemcy > >range. > > > 455 KHz IF maybe? Probably not: the wire was layered, whereas all the 455 Kc/s I.F. transformers I have seen were wave wound with Litz wire to give the highest possible 'Q'. - and they had a lot more than 40 turns. > > > > > I am now beginning to wonder about the other inductors in the crystal > >'pulling' circuits, which are running at about 15 Mc/s and come from the > >same batch. The behaviour of the oscillator had been somewhat strange > >at times, so the cores could be causing trouble there too. > > I've wound high-Q inductors on a Sharpie. > > https://www.highlandtechnology.com/Product/T850 > > All the commercial inductors that I tried (pcb revs A and B) fried. I'm not after a particularly high 'Q', but if the coils are stupidly 'flat', that might explain why I had such difficulty getting a good signal out of the oscillator. I'm in unknown territory with this circuit, as the crystal frequency has to be modulated on transmit and pulled on receive. The partially-complete circuit of the Xtal oscillator and multiplier chain is at: http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/Transceiver/XtalOsc5a.gif The block diagram explains the reason for needing these particularfrequencies: http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/Transceiver/Blockdiag6d.gif I wind my air-cored coils on the shanks of drill bits or on the barrels of nut-drivers to give a known repeatable diameter. The wire is some fairly hefty stuff with insulating varnish which has to be filed off before soldering (if doesn't self-flux like many modern winding wires). -- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk