Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240317153203.00006be1@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: filling area by color atack safety Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 15:32:03 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <20240317153203.00006be1@yahoo.com> References: <ut3669$21eur$1@i2pn2.org> <ut4020$2s8ov$1@dont-email.me> <87wmq2jn7s.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <ut4ba7$2uits$1@dont-email.me> <SqlJN.144025$CYpe.59290@fx40.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fd62a22e31fcf9828d4eedf77229489a"; logging-data="3728424"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19IRkS1nrzBIu0qjLEBn4VkiFckfB4Z4cQ=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:oNVPzUZ2FoPoH3U9/aYJHxRL39s= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2076 On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:21:38 GMT scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: > Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes: > >On 16/03/2024 13:55, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > >> Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >>> Recursion make programs harder to reason about and prove correct. > >>> > >> > >> Are you prepared to offer any evidence to support this astonishing > >> statement or can we just assume it's another Malcolmism? > >> > > > >Example given. A recursive algorithm which is hard to reason about > >and > > Perhaps hard for _you_ to reason about. That doesn't > generalize to every other programmer that might read that > code. > > As a matter of fact, David Brown was not able to reason about depth of recursion in fir's code. And you answered David's post without spotting his mistake. Now, I don't know if you didn't spot his mistake because you didn't read this part of his message or because for you too it was hard to reason about depth of recursion.