Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20240415104825.00004b47@example.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Chechnya bans music that is too fast or too slow
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:48:25 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <20240415104825.00004b47@example.com>
References: <20240414200533.0000712b@example.com>
	<334p1jl07tqejstnfjrrk77d81j3ri11t8@4ax.com>
	<NMOdnYPrlOlMWIH7nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:48:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1b616dc283f24329b26ddc25905d685d";
	logging-data="368590"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qor4qSh072ClnzqwGJkyRMPitvKVOiZg="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:E3zKdF8GrCINvUSkGdHjyMTwUKE=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240415-2, 4/15/2024), Outbound message
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 2542

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:14:41 +0000
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> On Apr 14, 2024 at 7:27:23 PM PDT, "shawn"
> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 20:05:33 -0400, Rhino
> > <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> In one of the weirder cultural laws I've ever heard of, the
> >> government of Chechnya (which is a region of Russia, not a
> >> separate country) has legislated that the tempo of all music
> >> played in the country must be in the range of 80 to 116 beats per
> >> minute.
> >> 
> >> Adam Neely points out why this is decidedly "problematic":
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q811R6YsM0s [10 minutes]  
> > 
> > Yeah, I remember hearing about this back a few weeks. As I recall
> > even the national anthem doesn't fit with this new standard.  
> 
> What if you just cut the time signature from 4/4 to 2/2, and the cuts
> the BPM in half, too.
> 
> Would it be a defense in court to say, "No, your honor, the state is
> lying. They're claiming I was rocking out to Tschaikowsky's 4th
> Symphony at 180 BPM but the half note had the beat, so it was really
> only 90 BPM!"
> 
> 

That is the essence of many of Neely's observations about this bizarre
new rule. He even enlists a Canadian music professor in the discussion
to get an expert opinion.


-- 
Rhino