Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20240416c@crcomp.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Don" <g@crcomp.net>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Predictive failures
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:25:30 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <20240416c@crcomp.net>
References: <uvjn74$d54b$1@dont-email.me> <20240416a@crcomp.net> <bvst1j1qkoe7gu2l2s1qu9irs476oti9mf@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:25:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="67bd8e3130374e1c0bb2fce27a54733f";
	logging-data="1273172"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LwNqSqowvPzPsZnnEXG/T"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O2Dqlyr5CmfwA/Bvhxqa33HS+Ao=
Bytes: 2983

john larkin wrote:
> Don wrote:
>>Don Y wrote:
>>> Is there a general rule of thumb for signalling the likelihood of
>>> an "imminent" (for some value of "imminent") hardware failure?
>>>
>>> I suspect most would involve *relative* changes that would be
>>> suggestive of changing conditions in the components (and not
>>> directly related to environmental influences).
>>>
>>> So, perhaps, a good strategy is to just "watch" everything and
>>> notice the sorts of changes you "typically" encounter in the hope
>>> that something of greater magnitude would be a harbinger...
>>
>>A singular speculative spitball - the capacitive marker:
>>
>>    In-situ Prognostic Method of Power MOSFET Based on Miller Effect
>>
>>    ... This paper presents a new in-situ prognosis method for
>>    MOSFET based on miller effect. According to the theory
>>    analysis, simulation and experiment results, the miller
>>    platform voltage is identified as a new degradation
>>    precursor ...
>>
>>    (10.1109/PHM.2017.8079139)
>
> Sounds like they are really measuring gate threshold, or gate transfer
> curve, drift with time. That happens and is usually no big deal, in
> moderation. Ions and charges drift around. We don't build opamp
> front-ends from power mosfets.
>
> This doesn't sound very useful for "in-situ" diagnostics.
>
> GaN fets can have a lot of gate threshold and leakage change over time
> too. Drive them hard and it doesn't matter.

Threshold voltage measurement is indeed one of two parameters. The
second parameter is Miller platform voltage measurement.
    The Miller plateau is directly related to the gate-drain
capacitance, Cgd. It's why "capacitive marker" appears in my
original followup.
    Long story short, the Miller Plateau length provides a metric
principle to measure Tj without a sensor. Some may find this useful.

Danke,

-- 
Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.