Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240417095512.00007ccc@gmail.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: on Perl Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:55:12 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <20240417095512.00007ccc@gmail.com> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <20240408075547.000061e8@gmail.com> <g52cnWOOwoz_son7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <uvbe3m$2cun7$1@dont-email.me> <Mkidnafag8vlooH7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <pan$c8c3e$b0e492b3$c544c27e$d72bff90@invalid.invalid> <uvk8o6$h2pg$3@dont-email.me> <20240415152951.000079ab@gmail.com> <uvkbec$hjeq$1@dont-email.me> <uvlc1f$rgng$1@dont-email.me> <slrnv1smf9.25p4.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <uvm35m$10egq$1@dont-email.me> <EpwTN.247849$zF_1.119459@fx18.iad> <uvm5bp$10uuu$1@dont-email.me> <uvm69k$1154r$1@dont-email.me> <uvm6b5$116e9$1@dont-email.me> <20240416084923.00005c8a@gmail.com> <uvm6pg$119gi$1@dont-email.me> <20240416085912.00001a9b@gmail.com> <uvm82d$11io2$1@dont-email.me> <20240416091813.00003dd8@gmail.com> <uvo0s3$1ga3v$1@dont-email.me> <20240417075943.00006cb4@gmail.com> <uvosih$1mltt$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:55:15 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7a885d53952e506d4bfe7e1038b86033"; logging-data="1785990"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1842Xhm2xN/bw7Pgkf0CDrybbg6by06OrY=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:EASMpelsPoslsONxY29ZVF8fnV4= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 3398 On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:15:14 -0000 (UTC) Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote: > >(it means i am engaging in what is nominally a gesture of respect in > >a mocking way, so as to indicate that your pompous demands for > >respect are being deliberately ignored) > > Wasn't a demand for respect, just making a point about serious > applications and the languages used for them. Games arn't serious. Your definition of "serious applications" seems to coincide pretty substantially with "fields I, personally, have worked in," particularly since you've conveniently ignored the passel of non-game applications that have also been cited in order to focus on the one you feel most prepared to trivialize and discount in pursuance of your "argument." And in addition to habitually slagging on applications and tools you don't consider "serious" for no particular reason and with zero provocation, you name-call like a grade-schooler. So it's difficult *not* to parse your overall behavior as simian chest-thumping and expecting to be treated as Le Fromage Grande on the basis of standards conveniently set by yourself. > Have another go aspie. Case in point. But for the sake of argument, let's review: Person: "This thing exists." Muttley: "Nobody uses that." People: "Here's all these things that use that." Muttley: "Those don't count." People: "Come again?" Muttley: "They're not serious." People: "What's your definition of 'serious' here?" Muttley: "Things that I've worked on." People: "...Um." Muttley: "Also you're a poopiehead."