Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20240521150006.00000c6b@example.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Second Circuit upholds New York City's Kafka-esque code
 enforcement
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 15:00:06 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <20240521150006.00000c6b@example.com>
References: <v2ilmh$mrv2$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 21:00:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a5acfd34d5d083a9b28ad1c014840d3a";
	logging-data="777767"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YPpeyn5ogghk5Bh7lVXLEDPwXlWaEY2U="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7eVxh5CH1jIzQm0UlyHtPGCU/i4=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240521-6, 5/21/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 2361

On Tue, 21 May 2024 17:29:54 -0000 (UTC)
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> Institute for Justice client loses appeal to Second Circuit. Case
> doesn't survive motion to dismiss based on timeliness, seemingly in
> violation of recent Supreme Court decision that statute of limitations
> does not begin till all governmental process ends.
> 
> Man was issued a series of citations with huge fines for harmless code
> vioations by city of New York department of buildings. He had a
> hearing on several of the citations but other citations were
> unreviewable.
> 
> Second Circuit ruled that he's outside the statute of limitations
> because "he should have known" at the time the unreviewable citation
> was issued that he had to file suit in federal court by a certain
> deadline.
> 
> 'Cuz, you know, people who aren't lawyers know these things.
> 
> Now the guy has no way to contest the due process violation, as an
> unreviewable citation receives no "process" at all. I assume there is
> also language in the state constitution.
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iltc83Lw1eY
> 
> IJ has a decent track record but does not when 'em all.

I assume that the "when" in the last sentence was supposed to be
"win".

-- 
Rhino