Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240527110547.00006d07@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 11:05:47 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <20240527110547.00006d07@yahoo.com> References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me> <00297443-2fee-48d4-81a0-9ff6ae6481e4@gmail.com> <v2lji1$1bbcp$1@dont-email.me> <87msoh5uh6.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <f08d2c9f-5c2e-495d-b0bd-3f71bd301432@gmail.com> <v2nbp4$1o9h6$1@dont-email.me> <v2ng4n$1p3o2$1@dont-email.me> <87y18047jk.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87msoe1xxo.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v2sh19$2rle2$2@dont-email.me> <87ikz11osy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v2v59g$3cr0f$1@dont-email.me> <v2v7ni$3d70v$1@dont-email.me> <20240526161832.000012a6@yahoo.com> <v2vka0$3f4a2$1@dont-email.me> <20240526193549.000031a8@yahoo.com> <v30l85$3mcj6$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 10:05:38 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="22cc5f112416a8c860c9da64769d2973"; logging-data="4140172"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1LyqhNK2N9364LZg8cRnAMAo4kHyxdH4=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:1llj30U89NvNT/ry2v+zQF5GbeE= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2208 On Mon, 27 May 2024 00:48:05 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 26 May 2024 19:35:49 +0300, Michael S wrote: >=20 > > Faster than new MSVC, but slower than old MSVC. =20 >=20 > New MSVC is slower than old MSVC?!? Say it isn=E2=80=99t so! Is not it a case for just about any compiler that has a long history of development? Compilers become slower over time. In return they support newer dialects of input language and generate better diagnostics. They also try to produce faster code, with very varying levels of success. This trend was most easily seen during first decade of LLVM/clang.