Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20240529124443.0000600f@yahoo.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:44:43 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <20240529124443.0000600f@yahoo.com>
References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me>
	<00297443-2fee-48d4-81a0-9ff6ae6481e4@gmail.com>
	<v2lji1$1bbcp$1@dont-email.me>
	<87msoh5uh6.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<f08d2c9f-5c2e-495d-b0bd-3f71bd301432@gmail.com>
	<v2nbp4$1o9h6$1@dont-email.me>
	<v2ng4n$1p3o2$1@dont-email.me>
	<87y18047jk.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<87msoe1xxo.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<v2sh19$2rle2$2@dont-email.me>
	<87ikz11osy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<v2v59g$3cr0f$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240528144118.00002012@yahoo.com>
	<v34odg$kh7a$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240528185624.00002494@yahoo.com>
	<v359f1$nknu$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240528232315.00006a58@yahoo.com>
	<20240529004530.00005793@yahoo.com>
	<v35ssd$qq9b$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240529092109.0000246b@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:44:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cc56f7764e2eeae1c5e3f45aa7e89a16";
	logging-data="1144388"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LnZkiz8EIaXJTQk/PYBMrzcNsZBgkJsI="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TSypQAssYlAMBHf7PqaaerGEDs8=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2255

On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:21:09 +0300
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 29 May 2024 01:29:00 +0100
> bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I think runtime is still primarily spent in I/O.
> >   
> 
> That's undoubtedly correct.

:(
Two hours later it turned out to be completely incorrect. That is, the
time was spent in routine related to I/O, but in the 'soft' part of it
rather than in the I/O itself.
Hopefully, next time I'd remember to avoid the word 'undoubtedly'.