Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240529124443.0000600f@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:44:43 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <20240529124443.0000600f@yahoo.com> References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me> <00297443-2fee-48d4-81a0-9ff6ae6481e4@gmail.com> <v2lji1$1bbcp$1@dont-email.me> <87msoh5uh6.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <f08d2c9f-5c2e-495d-b0bd-3f71bd301432@gmail.com> <v2nbp4$1o9h6$1@dont-email.me> <v2ng4n$1p3o2$1@dont-email.me> <87y18047jk.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87msoe1xxo.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v2sh19$2rle2$2@dont-email.me> <87ikz11osy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v2v59g$3cr0f$1@dont-email.me> <20240528144118.00002012@yahoo.com> <v34odg$kh7a$1@dont-email.me> <20240528185624.00002494@yahoo.com> <v359f1$nknu$1@dont-email.me> <20240528232315.00006a58@yahoo.com> <20240529004530.00005793@yahoo.com> <v35ssd$qq9b$1@dont-email.me> <20240529092109.0000246b@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:44:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cc56f7764e2eeae1c5e3f45aa7e89a16"; logging-data="1144388"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LnZkiz8EIaXJTQk/PYBMrzcNsZBgkJsI=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:TSypQAssYlAMBHf7PqaaerGEDs8= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2255 On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:21:09 +0300 Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Wed, 29 May 2024 01:29:00 +0100 > bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote: > > > > > I think runtime is still primarily spent in I/O. > > > > That's undoubtedly correct. :( Two hours later it turned out to be completely incorrect. That is, the time was spent in routine related to I/O, but in the 'soft' part of it rather than in the I/O itself. Hopefully, next time I'd remember to avoid the word 'undoubtedly'.