Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240602110213.00003b25@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 11:02:13 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 51 Message-ID: <20240602110213.00003b25@yahoo.com> References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me> <v2o57g$1t5p4$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <7d0e8f25-a8ba-4995-9b90-ff35f85d423f@gmail.com> <v2p91e$26lpk$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <beffc569-3606-b627-ded9-93ce8478f2dd@please.ty> <v2qfi0$2de9j$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v2unfe$3alds$1@dont-email.me> <v2v637$3cunk$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v3dmq6$2edto$1@dont-email.me> <hOu6O.6223$xPJ1.1866@fx09.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 10:02:02 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c0fad7677b29e85d96fa4df5e9fc1789"; logging-data="3434540"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yPr+IXg7OWidNGPihIIX/c3opMz2f498=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:5zXcDmVtmusD27MNj9uPaPfOasw= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 3235 On Sat, 01 Jun 2024 01:27:41 GMT scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: > Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes: > >On 5/26/2024 6:23 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: > >> Am 26.05.2024 um 09:13 schrieb jak: > >> > >>> About this I only agree partially because it depends a lot on the > >>> context in which it is used. Moreover, I would not know how to > >>> indicate an optimal programming language for all seasons. > >> > >> C++ is in almost any case the better C. > >> > >>> What you describe is the greatest inconvenience of c++. To make > >>> only one example, when they decided to rewrite the FB platform to > >>> accelerate it, they thought of migrating from php to c++ and they > >>> had a collapse of the staff suitable for work, so they thought of > >>> relying a compiler that translated the php into c++ and many of > >>> the new languages were born to try to remedy hits complexity. > >> > >> C++ is the wrong language for web applications. > >> I like Java more for that. > > > >C++ is the wrong language for real time apps. > > That's an incorrect statement. > > > No memory allocation allowed. > > It is trivially easy to write C++ code that doesn't > allocate memory dynamically. > > > > >I use C++ for my server side apps on my webserver. Works great. > > I use C++ for operating systems (you can't get more real-time > than that) Engines control is FAR more real-time that OS, to list just one example out of many. Of course, nowadays most of these things are no longer done on general-purpose CPUs or even MCUs. > and bare-metal hypervisors. It is hard to believe that you don't have at least one co-worker that is begging to switch all new development to C approximately every week. And couple of folks that beg for Rust.