Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20240607145109.0000652d@yahoo.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Interval Comparisons
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:51:09 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <20240607145109.0000652d@yahoo.com>
References: <v3merq$b1uj$1@dont-email.me>
	<pan$63fde$3c88716e$c61af1ee$d0a27c97@invalid.invalid>
	<v3o706$kfrm$2@dont-email.me>
	<v3o7jr$ki9u$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3of4h$pbb1$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3t0aa$1k8ck$2@dont-email.me>
	<v3tene$1n5ge$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3tlkj$1of9j$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3tqji$1t2fv$1@dont-email.me>
	<87bk4dz9ve.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<v3ujg5$20s0s$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3unc7$20up1$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3uobg$21g4g$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 13:51:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f4c269c2d964292666b8d7eb6c13d637";
	logging-data="2129071"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18kRVwtIHz+uXQSU2A0b1GEbuneerMUmqU="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Hb8hVd1xjyNaZ1NFyHGmsxepwHk=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2040

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 10:45:05 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:28:23 +0100, bart wrote:
>=20
> > However, 'a > b <=3D c' is not clear. =20
>=20
> One thing it would have been handy to have is some way of saying
>=20
>     b < a or b > c
>=20
> in a chained comparison somehow. In other words, =E2=80=9Cnot (a < b < c)=
=E2=80=9D
> without the negation and need for the parentheses (and
> correspondingly for the obvious usages of =E2=80=9C<=3D=E2=80=9D and =E2=
=80=9C>=3D=E2=80=9D).

"Out of range" expressed as negation of "in range" looks to me as least
confusing.