Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 11:19:53 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <20240609111953.00001861@yahoo.com>
References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240530180345.00003d9f@yahoo.com>
	<v3chc4$27uij$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240531161937.000063af@yahoo.com>
	<20240531162811.00006719@yahoo.com>
	<20240531164835.00007128@yahoo.com>
	<v3cldt$28n91$2@dont-email.me>
	<20240531173437.00003bee@yahoo.com>
	<v3d3ct$2b5sl$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3d97c$2c6ea$1@dont-email.me>
	<22r6O.5934$xPJ1.2590@fx09.iad>
	<v3t6nu$1liet$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3tlmo$1o860$7@dont-email.me>
	<v3vvph$27spv$1@dont-email.me>
	<v40hum$2err2$1@dont-email.me>
	<2KY8O.216$gSy9.183@fx38.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 10:19:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6a2ea81ad9dc1fc6d46f58b03380a32f";
	logging-data="3492441"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DgAAQdVieTUr66/ZOfN5HUA9pj6Cpipc="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EDbZU7R+hv3m/aw7vhkpsTywA9I=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2962

On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 13:09:18 GMT
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote:

> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
> >On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 16:58:08 -0500, BGB-Alt wrote:
> > =20
> >> I think code generation went in the bulky direction when they
> >> started adding auto-vectorization, and not really any option to be
> >> like "Yes, I want SIMD instructions enabled, but, no, don't
> >> autovectorize."
> >>=20
> >> Sometimes vectorization makes things faster, sometimes not, but one
> >> thing it does do, is make the generated binaries bigger. =20
> >
> >And MSVC is the compiler that Microsoft use to build Windows itself,
> >isn=E2=80=99t it? =20
>=20
> Last time I built NT, it used the command line compiler 'cl.exe',
> IIRC.
>=20
> Granted that was 1998.

MSVC is a common informal moniker. It seems, after it was adapted by
godbolt.org it became even more common than before.
cl.exe is the name of executive for very long time. I don't know how
long exactly, but would guess that more than 30 years.

Versions of compiler that were officially approved to build kernel
modules (supplied with DDK) were historically not the same versions
that were sold for user mode application development as part Visual
Studio package or of Windows SDK package. Not that they were radically
different, just frozen at different points in time.
Nowadays, it seems, the versions are more in sync.