Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240617123926.00006a12@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Good hash for pointers Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:39:26 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <20240617123926.00006a12@yahoo.com> References: <v2n88p$1nlcc$1@dont-email.me> <v2qm8m$2el55$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v2qnue$2evlu$1@dont-email.me> <v2r9br$2hva2$1@dont-email.me> <86fru6gsqr.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2sudq$2trh1$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <8634q5hjsp.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2vmhr$3ffjk$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <86le3wfsmd.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2voe7$3fr50$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <86ed9ofq14.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240605005916.00001b33@yahoo.com> <86a5jzmle1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240605195905.00002484@yahoo.com> <86y17ilm4k.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240606110009.00001096@yahoo.com> <86zfrkj93b.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:39:09 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="21c0d5cac32843964269a269a3ca89e9"; logging-data="607686"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+BwflvONcwA6eQ3Ncg/Il6JyIHhlgPlB0=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:kUWapTuqgEhCrVjodfPo3EfltzA= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2191 On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:56:40 -0700 Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote: > > I don't know why you say that. C was an ANSI standard before it > was an ISO standard. Or is it that you think that the language > Malcolm is intent on using does not conform to C90/C89/ANSI C? > > All I wanted to point by this comment is that ANSI recognizes ISO/IEC 9899:2018 as their current C Standard and probably will recognize the next ISO C Standard pretty soon. For that reason I think that names like C89 or C90 are preferable (to ANSI C) when we want to refer to this particular variant of the language.