Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240625a@crcomp.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don <g@crcomp.net> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Dr Mirabolis: Blish's Baconian bookend Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:46:00 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 104 Message-ID: <20240625a@crcomp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8stipulation Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:46:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="93026df895b79f383c487fc832932347"; logging-data="1864121"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX182bBYZTl3uhaMlB1xthlEP" Cancel-Lock: sha1:XP2ZFC7+FXmx/Rl9HsTYLzDMDJw= Bytes: 5764 This tract treats Roger Bacon and Francis Bacon as bookends in a breakout of London history from 1200 AD to 1700 AD - from Medieval to Renaissance to Enlightenment. _Dr Mirabolis_ by Blish pertains to the earlier, less famous Bacon, Roger. Both Bacons have hidden histories. Francis hid his history by choice. To keep his politics private, poet Francis fondly, figuratively donned the cap of invisibility of his muse - Pallas Athena the Spear-shaker [1]. The status quo suppressed scientist Roger for wrong think. Science vacillates between peak Platonism and Aristotelian apexes and Roger had the misfortune to profess Platonism at an Aristotelian apogee. "A great scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." This is a tale of three cities: London, Paris, and Rome. Blish excels at exposition of medieval life - where an unskilled worker made about one pound per annum and a stonemason four [2]. Roger spent two thousand pounds of inherited wealth on books. Because the written word was obscenely expensive before Gutenberg's printing press. Blish penned _Dr Mirabolis_ as historical fiction to enliven Roger's dry history. Although the novel's popular among Baconian scholars, it's unpopular with many Blish fans. Contemporary literati also appears ignorant of _Dr Mirabolis_ given its belief in Roger Bacon's Brazen Head. In his invaluable end note Blish reveals: the famous story of the brass head, for instance, is an ancient Arabic legend ... It became attached to Bacon only late in the sixteenth century, via a play called Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay by Shakespeare's forgotten rival Robert Greene. ... Since 1589, the brazen head has lived an underground life as the golem, Frankenstein's monster, Karel Capek’s robots and their innumerable spawn, and today, perhaps, as Dr. Claude Shannon's mechanical player (after Poe) of indifferent chess. Greene's "Groats-worth of Wit" obliquely accuses William of Stratford Upon Avon of plagiarism. "Oh what a tangled web we weave When first we practice to deceive," Blish credits the creation of the Scientific Method to Roger. Unfortunately London favors poets over scientists. The Royal Society was founded in 1660 by a group of natural philosophers who had met originally in the mid-1640s to discuss the ideas of Francis Bacon. <https://www.rct.uk/collection/1057783/the-history-of-the-royal-society-of-london-for-the-improving-of-natural-knowledge> An excerpt from Blish's end note says this in regards to Francis Bacon: It is a pity that no major theoretical physicist or mathematician of our time has read either [Bacon]. My own firm opinion is that Sir Francis Bacon's scheme for the elaboration of the sciences is purely the work of a literary genius, marvellously gratifying to read, but without the slightest demonstrable influence upon the history of science; in fact, had the scheme ever been realized, it would almost surely have set the sciences back a century or more, for Sir Francis, though surrounded by scientists of the first order, never had the slightest insight into how a scientist must necessarily think if his work is to come to any fruit whatsoever. The test of this judgment is that it is impossible to show any line of scientific thought after Sir Francis that is indebted to the Novum Organum. Blish begins with a Dramatis Peronae to enumerate all of the characters within _Doctor Mirabilis_. It's also a technique also utilized by the Perry Rhodan epic Science Fiction. As an aside, by virtue of its sheer polyglot mass, the name Perry Rhodan is destined to join Beowulf throughout the millenia ahead. # # # Here's a Platonic pi prize for readers who made it all the way to the end: <https://redd.it/1dh7jvt> Note: [1] At first her name was Pallas Athene, as she is called by Homer in The Iliad; though sometimes he calls her just Athene or just Pallas, but after about 500 BC she is referred to as Athena, after her whom her namesake city was called and of which she was patron goddess. Pallas is really an epithet for her and means the "spear shaker," and spear shaking was the dominant intimidating attitude of a warrior back then. <https://web.archive.org/web/20030219110443/http://www.thevalkyrie.com/stories/html/athene/> [2] _Roger Bacon - The First Scientist_ (Clegg) Danke, -- Don.......My cat's )\._.,--....,'``. https://crcomp.net/reviews.php telltale tall tail /, _.. \ _\ (`._ ,. Walk humbly with thy God. tells tall tales.. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' Make 1984 fiction again.