| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<20240630a@crcomp.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Don <g@crcomp.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: [Tears] Earth Abides by George R. Stewart
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:00:28 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <20240630a@crcomp.net>
References: <v5rllj$t80$1@panix2.panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8stipulation
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e5478d74ecf6048c28ac0ca49158d57e";
logging-data="632527"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+J6RH+6yszaT92uZ8Uts9W"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xsx9zMG/dAEwIXZRGid/BUZPaCg=
Bytes: 2854
James wrote:
> Earth Abides by George R. Stewart
>
> A lucky survivor of the pandemic that nearly annihilated humanity
> resolves to rebuild civilization, with the help of fellow survivors
> and his own lack of applicable skills.
>
> https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/purple-mountain-majesties
Excerpted from your review:
2: Until I looked up Berkeley to check the spelling, which
I invariably get wrong, I did not know it was named for
/that/ Bishop Berkeley.
Catholic Berkeley's Notebook contains this intriguing passage:
N.B. my Abstract & general Doctrines ought not to be condemn'd
by [Francis Bacon's] Royall Society [of London].
In regards to Berkeley's Relativity, the Wikipedia article you cite is a
hot mess. Something about Berkeley's attitude seems to anger both
Bacon's Royal Society of London and Wikipedia. Here's Berkeley's
pertinent thoughts on Relativity:
Absolute Space and Motion
Absolute motion and absolute space are not understood
realistically or instrumentally by Berkeley. He recommends
that natural philosophers dismiss the concepts. Relative
space and motion will more than adequately serve the
purposes of physics. The debate about absolute motion and
space has a long and complex history. Berkeley’s critique
is often regarded as an anticipation of that of Ernest Mach.
<https://iep.utm.edu/george-berkeley-philosophy-of-science/>
Berkeley's Relativity anticipated Einstein's Relativity, in other words.
This topic was last broached by me in rec.arts.sf.written about a decade
ago. And at least one regular back then acted insulted and promised to
have the last word on Wikipedia. ROTFLMAO.
Danke,
--
Don.......My cat's )\._.,--....,'``. https://crcomp.net/reviews.php
telltale tall tail /, _.. \ _\ (`._ ,. Walk humbly with thy God.
tells tall tales.. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' Make 1984 fiction again.