Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240812105607.00000a89@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Instruction Tracing Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:56:07 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <20240812105607.00000a89@yahoo.com> References: <2024Aug10.121802@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <memo.20240810204133.20940T@jgd.cix.co.uk> <v98qq8$ukip$1@dont-email.me> <ygnikw6lf8j.fsf@y.z> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:55:31 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2556c59b1c899658c092ba80d28007fd"; logging-data="3379084"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mnrGu6ykWtluqYEL5Mzse90AcXel/t9I=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:af/P0dlvFBOUA+0VOmIMYxJiaHY= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 1941 On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 21:08:44 -0400 Josh Vanderhoof <x@y.z> wrote: > BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> writes: > > > Meanwhile, saw a video recently where someone had ported Doom to a > > 233 MHz PowerPC (running Windows NT4) machine and, its performance > > was not good... > > > > Not obvious is what combination of factors conspired to cause Doom > > to apparently run at single-digit framerates. > > > > Video mentioned that it was drawing using GDI calls, but this by > > itself wouldn't explain the level of slowness seen in the video. > > > > Like, presumably, this would require around 90% + of the clock > > cycles going into overhead, which seems a bit much. > > > > > > Reference: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAkSJ-HqKw8 > > I think NT4 was before CreateDIBSection existed. Probably much slower > without that. NT4 has CreateDIBSection.