Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20240829102839.5bb67af25e568ebabc65ede6@eircom.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: RP2350 and Pico 2 - things missing
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:28:39 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <20240829102839.5bb67af25e568ebabc65ede6@eircom.net>
References: <v9lbfn$10qjj$2@dont-email.me>
	<v9pj3v$1qse0$7@dont-email.me>
	<lin8sjFbh5vU1@mid.individual.net>
	<va6s6f$c7dr$1@dont-email.me>
	<50ae75b3cdb83be61d995844169642d211670e3e.camel@munted.eu>
	<20240822115703.a377f409dd25c1b1f76f6c61@eircom.net>
	<va9k44$s0gf$2@dont-email.me>
	<20240823111241.fa25c2e204942a50ef8ccac5@eircom.net>
	<vac28j$1ab6s$6@dont-email.me>
	<20240824091356.eadff502925e2f0760693e89@eircom.net>
	<vagq3v$2a0g5$3@dont-email.me>
	<vai25u$2fn77$1@dont-email.me>
	<vajkr1$2rhoq$1@dont-email.me>
	<vajvlj$2shf7$1@dont-email.me>
	<valnib$35rt8$3@dont-email.me>
	<vao1af$3jojc$1@dont-email.me>
	<wwv4j73zq32.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:30:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f0517049c6c15bca0effd6390305ca1d";
	logging-data="4124091"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+iio8xaVBQhD82yWpjS4sXQx9eFWvneCs="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3f3uXuZ0BfGWx5IHZx4o8vyA2+E=
X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett"
X-Newsreader: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0)
Bytes: 2348

On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:32:49 +0100
Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> I don’t think I’d fault either decision though the fact that we’ve ended
> up with two conventions does make writing/maintaining portable code a
> bit more annoying,

	Portable code should only rely on the standards not
implementations, some very weird possibilities are legal within the
standard.

	There are always the int<n>_t types for when size matters.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/
For forms of government let fools contest
Whate're is best administered is best - Alexander Pope