Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: RP2350 and Pico 2 - things missing
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 13:47:24 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <20240902134724.ec2e389004ebb09be34cbd49@eircom.net>
References: <v9lbfn$10qjj$2@dont-email.me>
	<v9pj3v$1qse0$7@dont-email.me>
	<lin8sjFbh5vU1@mid.individual.net>
	<va6s6f$c7dr$1@dont-email.me>
	<50ae75b3cdb83be61d995844169642d211670e3e.camel@munted.eu>
	<20240822115703.a377f409dd25c1b1f76f6c61@eircom.net>
	<va9k44$s0gf$2@dont-email.me>
	<20240823111241.fa25c2e204942a50ef8ccac5@eircom.net>
	<vac28j$1ab6s$6@dont-email.me>
	<20240824091356.eadff502925e2f0760693e89@eircom.net>
	<vagq3v$2a0g5$3@dont-email.me>
	<vai25u$2fn77$1@dont-email.me>
	<vajkr1$2rhoq$1@dont-email.me>
	<vajvlj$2shf7$1@dont-email.me>
	<valnib$35rt8$3@dont-email.me>
	<vao1af$3jojc$1@dont-email.me>
	<wwv4j73zq32.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
	<vapoe0$3v5v2$2@dont-email.me>
	<vaqluo$3k35e$1@dont-email.me>
	<vb16c8$1dlt4$14@dont-email.me>
	<vb1ecm$1eunr$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240901115314.3d7795351c717fa546c0f6dc@eircom.net>
	<vb1uqb$1gtao$1@dont-email.me>
	<5e84806798870aa1c6d8204239989fdd3241bbda.camel@munted.eu>
	<vb49vv$2r0bp$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 15:00:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="363b0b6bd8c7cfb2f3397111a85cc591";
	logging-data="3005356"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FZEKdTkrr+7fM7/2bO/9oBb9OlS21xwM="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:87v5whu0LesRGddJyPKuEr7EjS8=
X-Newsreader: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0)
X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett"
Bytes: 2612

On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 13:10:38 +0100
mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> wrote:

> However, the SHARC stuff was definitely derived from gcc 1.x in 1998 as 
> it struck me as very old as 2.x had been out for a while by then.

	I recall that gcc 1.6.3 was considered something of a golden
version of the original C compiler and IIRC 2.0 brought in a lot of the
structure that converted it from the GNU C Compile to the GNU Compiler
Collection.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/
For forms of government let fools contest
Whate're is best administered is best - Alexander Pope