Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <20240911022413.00007cbd@yahoo.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20240911022413.00007cbd@yahoo.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:24:13 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <20240911022413.00007cbd@yahoo.com>
References: <vaqgtl$3526$1@dont-email.me>
	<memo.20240830090549.19028u@jgd.cix.co.uk>
	<2024Aug30.161204@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
	<86r09ulqyp.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<2024Sep8.173639@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
	<20240910114903.00003fff@yahoo.com>
	<861q1ring8.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<20240910222702.000009a1@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 01:24:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c6e394e864c148bbd8a908f0c36891f6";
	logging-data="3342888"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+uJ/0V/bN+Jh7IoJnJJREju+u+lrsTSMI="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f35YgTgANZYtcFiITaLQb76D0rM=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 1717

On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 22:27:02 +0300
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 07:37:59 -0700
> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I should add that I appreciate your proposed solution;  it's
> > better than what I think I would have come up with under a
> > similar set of assumptions.  
> 
> Unfortunately, my solution is wrong and mistake is not even subtle.
> 
> 

This one appears to work: (src < dst+len) == (dst < src+len)