Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240917102755.724@kylheku.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Top 10 most common hard skills listed on resumes... Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:32:14 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <20240917102755.724@kylheku.com> References: <vab101$3er$1@reader1.panix.com> <vapitn$3u1ub$1@dont-email.me> <87o75bwlp8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaps06$3vg8l$1@dont-email.me> <871q27weeh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829083200.195@kylheku.com> <87v7zjuyd8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829084851.962@kylheku.com> <87mskvuxe9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaq9tu$1te8$1@dont-email.me> <vbci8r$1c9e8$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vbcs65$eabn$1@dont-email.me> <vbekut$1kd24$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vbepcb$q6p2$1@dont-email.me> <vbgb5q$1ruv8$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vbhbbb$1blt4$1@dont-email.me> <87tteqktr8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vbkjqk$201ms$1@dont-email.me> <87ttenk2nq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vbps3c$31s4d$1@dont-email.me> <875xr3jaz0.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <867cbccn78.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vc8vgr$2one0$1@dont-email.me> <20240916042822.629@kylheku.com> <vc9cjc$2s6vu$1@dont-email.me> <vc9lq5$2u802$1@dont-email.me> <vc9ov4$2uqam$3@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 19:32:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3f3af7de1de8264634d3a033bf168553"; logging-data="3816479"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+muSoPX3Buaqd4tvTFX6LY/B4kt7gPo5M=" User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8hq+J/FCk+OeDfzV3M3dcyv21IY= Bytes: 2827 On 2024-09-16, David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote: > On 16/09/2024 18:19, James Kuyper wrote: >> Any such defects can be corrected by filing a defect report and >> convincing the committee that the report is correct. If they agree, the >> next version of the standard is likely to contain revised wording to >> address the issue. Try doing that with the Bible. > > At the risk of offending people, I'd say this /has/ been done with the > Bible countless times. However, it was done 1) for ideological reasons, not to actually correct any of the obviously ridiculous stuff and 2) while pretending that it's all still literally God's word (and believing it). It's like if someone took C99 and removed, say, designated initializers, because they just don't like them, and then preached that their version of the document is still ISO 9899:1999, with people believing it and spreading the falsified document along with that claim that it is still the word of the ISO committee. -- TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca