Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture
 designer?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 02:54:51 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <20240918025451.0000558e@yahoo.com>
References: <memo.20240913205156.19028s@jgd.cix.co.uk>
	<vcd3ds$3o6ae$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:54:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b98425cb3c65aa1e430607c237ac1db3";
	logging-data="3926364"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/LYRdCKz6WnNR77l6a/POPPGqIazFpYK4="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oxfouOsnQoWD860KXkwAovV5kvw=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 1756

On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 23:30:04 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:51 +0100 (BST), John Dallman wrote:
>=20
> > Not many computer companies survive three failed architectures: has
> > that record been beaten? =20
>=20
> I think it=E2=80=99s fair to say that both Intel and Microsoft were compa=
nies
> more renowned for marketing prowess than actual technical brilliance.
>=20
> And now that that marketing prowess is fading somewhat, both
> companies are suffering a bit from a marketplace that is changing
> faster than they can cope.

There are few things Intel would wish more than to "suffer"
financially like Microsoft.