Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture
 designer?
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 02:57:21 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <20240922025721.00002910@yahoo.com>
References: <memo.20240913205156.19028s@jgd.cix.co.uk>
	<vcd3ds$3o6ae$2@dont-email.me>
	<2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org>
	<vcd7pr$3op6a$3@dont-email.me>
	<a20365f1bdcad769edd9e1f840edb2fe@www.novabbs.org>
	<vcda96$3p3a7$2@dont-email.me>
	<21028ed32d20f0eea9a754fafdb64e45@www.novabbs.org>
	<RECGO.45463$xO0f.22925@fx48.iad>
	<20240918190027.00003e4e@yahoo.com>
	<vcfp2q$8glq$5@dont-email.me>
	<jwv34lumjz7.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
	<vckpkg$18k7r$2@dont-email.me>
	<vckqus$18j12$2@dont-email.me>
	<vclvsa$1hf82$6@dont-email.me>
	<vcnabb$1nlod$3@dont-email.me>
	<vcnl6g$1p6a3$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:57:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a922624117b2cca4890197850cfa5a0d";
	logging-data="1885575"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/TPqyYs+Q8h805Vy5CJf7HmnL+MbrL6YQ="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jrDYURHYrfsx7Vk83cANqQivnQA=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2522

On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:34:40 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 13:29:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>=20
> > CPU's that are hyper close to the memory is good wrt locality.
> > However, the programming for it might turn some programmers off.
> > NUMA like for sure. =20
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m pretty sure those multi-million-node Linux supers that fill t=
he
> top of the Top500 list have a NUMA-style memory-addressing model.

You are wrong.
Last ccNuma was pushed out of top100 more than a decade ago.
All top machines today are MPP or clusters.=20
Not that a diffference between the two is well-defined.

After consulting Wikipeadia, it's probably far more than a decade.
The last one that I thought to be ccNuma, was in fact a cluster of
10 ccNuma computers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_(supercomputer)