| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<20240922115633.00006bce@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer? Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 11:56:33 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: <20240922115633.00006bce@yahoo.com> References: <memo.20240913205156.19028s@jgd.cix.co.uk> <vcd3ds$3o6ae$2@dont-email.me> <2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org> <2024Sep18.074007@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vcds4i$3vato$1@dont-email.me> <2024Sep18.220953@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vcfopr$8glq$3@dont-email.me> <ll232oFs6asU1@mid.individual.net> <vcgo74$gkr1$3@dont-email.me> <ll2n1hFu4lmU1@mid.individual.net> <vchu2q$mfu5$1@dont-email.me> <vchu67$mgk1$1@dont-email.me> <vcieqn$p8fv$1@dont-email.me> <vcj289$vddu$1@dont-email.me> <vcj8om$vupr$2@dont-email.me> <vck3t7$15g2i$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 10:56:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7cf389fedf0711ba281ba05afcbdcfa6"; logging-data="2248312"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bZyMiBzAecvLTSVB09kuHvG2P2KjehlA=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:rEvsqu+SQcx8b91M6/GQrEIGDv8= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 3116 On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:21:12 -0000 (UTC) Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com> wrote: > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote: > > On 20/09/2024 07:46, Thomas Koenig wrote: =20 > >> Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com> schrieb: =20 > >>> Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote: =20 > >>>> Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com> schrieb: > >>>> =20 > >>>>> Quantum mechanics is high IQ bullshit to make professors look > >>>>> important. =20 > >>>>=20 > >>>> You need quantum mechanics to describe solid-state electronics > >>>> (or all atoms, for that matter). =20 > >>>=20 > >>> Type =E2=80=9Cquantum mechanics criticism=E2=80=9D and variants into = Google and > >>> have at it. =20 > >>=20 > >> I've read enough crackpot theories already, thank you, I don't need > >> any more. =20 > >=20 > > Quantum mechanics describes the rules that give structure to atoms > > and molecules. On a larger scale, those structures build up to > > explain spherical planets. But we know the earth is flat. > > Therefore, quantum mechanics is bullshit. What more evidence could > > you want? =20 >=20 >=20 > Yup, you just explained the Einstein argument, just like I said. >=20 Einstein didn't like Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.=20 He didn't question the validity of equations. It's all was in different era. Philosophical interpretations were considered important.=20 The next generations of physicists, say, those who were born 100 or less years ago, were much less obsessed with this sort of stuff. Of course, there are exceptions, even to this day.