Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20240924110020.000073a3@yahoo.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 11:00:20 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <20240924110020.000073a3@yahoo.com>
References: <vbd6b9$g147$1@dont-email.me>
	<vckf9d$178f2$1@dont-email.me>
	<O2DHO.184073$kxD8.113118@fx11.iad>
	<e290e18a59651f93e4b46f4839713b1c@www.novabbs.org>
	<vcngfk$pkf$1@gal.iecc.com>
	<vcpfod$28muo$2@dont-email.me>
	<vct1s3$2tic0$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:59:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b1fade10e8a2bab21410dad877002ecd";
	logging-data="3291197"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+bYAVeaccwy4kPiutegKJSaFNB6j0ZsOc="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:T+NWnJwXIP0/eSJIfRmGuEk6Vo0=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2260

On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:41:39 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 09:14:04 -0700, Lars Poulsen wrote:
>=20
> > From a programmer's perspective, VAX exception handling was very
> > nice. It may have been high overhead, though. =20
>=20
> Very high overhead. But it was also language-independent, and
> integrated into the procedure-calling convention, which also managed
> to be language- independent.
>=20
> There is an internal memo on Bitsavers somewhere, critiquing a
> proposal to adopt the MIPS architecture (which DEC did, for just one
> machine, the DECstation 3000 if I recall rightly),=20

Much more than one machine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DECstation
4 ranges, 13 models.

DEC was quite successful both with MIPS and with x86.
I'd guess, their CPU designers didn't like it.

> and one of the
> points against MIPS was that it didn=E2=80=99t have language-independent
> exception handling. But then no other architecture, before the VAX or
> since, has been able to do that.