Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20241013160645.000015bc@yahoo.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:06:45 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <20241013160645.000015bc@yahoo.com>
References: <veb5fi$3ll7j$1@dont-email.me>
	<vedv0a$5m19$1@dont-email.me>
	<veeqhi$ar0c$2@dont-email.me>
	<veg59o$kolq$1@dont-email.me>
	<vegbeb$llri$2@dont-email.me>
	<vegc3l$lqrd$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
	<vegevc$m5na$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:06:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="892c1d91ddc3c98c5e442b7e028c5cd9";
	logging-data="3378373"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19lS0dAFqzlBLMQf0BfPB6otiXEr8672iE="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C1ki2JWUaagpdL1bGqplGugfmDc=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2230

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:38:04 -0300
Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> wrote:

> Em 10/13/2024 8:49 AM, Bonita Montero escreveu:
> > Am 13.10.2024 um 13:37 schrieb Thiago Adams:
> >   
> >> Yes.
> >> constexpr is like - "require the initializer to be a constant 
> >> expression." But the compiler will have to check it anyway.  
> > 
> > I cannot understand why you are so militantly against this
> > new language feature that can be understood in 10 seconds.
> >   
> 
> I have seen code like this:
> 
> void func()
> {
>     constexpr int c = 1;
>     f(c);
> }
> 
> For some reason, people believe that adding constexpr will magically 
> improve optimization. In reality, it doesn't change anything compared
> to const and often reflects a misunderstanding of how the compiler
> works. As a result, I end up having to explain it. In this sense,
> constexpr is viral and spreads confusion.
> 

I see constexpr primarily as a way to enable use of functions from
math.h in static initializers.