Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20241013160645.000015bc@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:06:45 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <20241013160645.000015bc@yahoo.com> References: <veb5fi$3ll7j$1@dont-email.me> <vedv0a$5m19$1@dont-email.me> <veeqhi$ar0c$2@dont-email.me> <veg59o$kolq$1@dont-email.me> <vegbeb$llri$2@dont-email.me> <vegc3l$lqrd$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vegevc$m5na$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:06:12 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="892c1d91ddc3c98c5e442b7e028c5cd9"; logging-data="3378373"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19lS0dAFqzlBLMQf0BfPB6otiXEr8672iE=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:C1ki2JWUaagpdL1bGqplGugfmDc= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2230 On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:38:04 -0300 Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> wrote: > Em 10/13/2024 8:49 AM, Bonita Montero escreveu: > > Am 13.10.2024 um 13:37 schrieb Thiago Adams: > > > >> Yes. > >> constexpr is like - "require the initializer to be a constant > >> expression." But the compiler will have to check it anyway. > > > > I cannot understand why you are so militantly against this > > new language feature that can be understood in 10 seconds. > > > > I have seen code like this: > > void func() > { > constexpr int c = 1; > f(c); > } > > For some reason, people believe that adding constexpr will magically > improve optimization. In reality, it doesn't change anything compared > to const and often reflects a misunderstanding of how the compiler > works. As a result, I end up having to explain it. In this sense, > constexpr is viral and spreads confusion. > I see constexpr primarily as a way to enable use of functions from math.h in static initializers.