References: <VWH_2ypup_sRKJJJHA6zPHlzZIo@jntp>
 <THdBgjYVdHGiOiCT2OJBvzsquwc@jntp>
 <ahh5hj9e48s5tjnj16f4b1mumtrrmgsaa0@news.usenet.ovh>
 <98a6a638c2928345348c49da3e580895@www.novabbs.org>
 <6713ea01$0$11258$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <vf2k0a$3157$1@cabale.usenet-fr.net>
 <vf2vq5$e522$1@dont-email.me>
Subject: Re: Multiple abuses from i2pn2.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20241020.160432.bc33f32e@mixmin.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:04:32 +0100
From: D <noreply@mixmin.net>
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!alphared!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128
Bytes: 2203
Lines: 28

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 15:15:47 +0200, nestorlambda <nestorlambda@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:
>Le 20/10/24 à 11:54, Olivier Miakinen a écrit :
>> One(¹) has 9 votes against 4(³) for the cancellation of all his crossposts (with
>> or without followup-to), but not for the cancellation of all his non-crossposted
>> articles (only 5 votes against 8).
>
>You are a small group of unbridled censors. The only thing that counts 
>is the rule of 80 more Yes votes than No votes which has always governed 
>usnet.
>Vous etes un groupuscules de censeurs effrénés. Seule compte la règle de 
>80 votes Oui de plus que de Non qui a toujours régi usnet.
>? ?   Nursery rhyme for elephant-man: 
>https://youtu.be/Ns92r5TQH3k?t=116   Birth of a cancelbot : 
>https://youtu.be/_kKHCVIdUBk?t=21

there are at least two hundred forty-seven (247) newsgroups in the
fr.* hierarchy (fr.bienvenue - fr.usenet.usages...possibly more on
some servers) of which only five of these newsgroups are moderated:

 fr.misc.bavardages.dinosaures m
 fr.usenet.abus.nocem m
 fr.usenet.abus.rapports m
 fr.usenet.forums.annonces m
 fr.usenet.stats m

they say that most newsservers do not accept or apply these nocems
or cancels, so wouldn't it be more effective to moderate disrupted
newsgroups than continually pound their rickety podium for "votes"?