Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <2024Oct7.091702@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<2024Oct7.091702@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: is Vax addressing sane today
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 07:17:02 GMT
Organization: Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <2024Oct7.091702@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <vdg3d1$2kdqr$1@dont-email.me> <memo.20241001101211.19028o@jgd.cix.co.uk> <20241001123426.000066c1@yahoo.com> <2024Oct1.182625@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vdknel$3e4pf$9@dont-email.me> <2024Oct3.085754@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vdne1a$3uaeh$4@dont-email.me> <m1rufjhpi09m9adedt87nrcdfmij1i8pvb@4ax.com> <2024Oct4.090534@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vdsnk4$ukl1$6@dont-email.me> <2024Oct6.104055@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vdv6ta$1dc01$8@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:27:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f074140e0322ced0afa14df7d2a88fd0";
	logging-data="1712898"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+o2v1y1OIhXYl5RCwCzj/j"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1pjHOf3A+9igVKFcMAlR0TBqifs=
X-newsreader: xrn 10.11
Bytes: 2568

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
>On Sun, 06 Oct 2024 08:40:55 GMT, Anton Ertl wrote:
>
>> Number of operand types never has been a criterion in any of the RISC
>> definitions I have seen, nor the number of instructions (although some
>> people like to go by that).
>
>It’s in the name: "Reduced Instruction Set Computer".

Not at all.  What you think of is a "fewer instructions computer", but
it's called a "reduced-instruction set computer".  It becomes more
obvious if you look at the opposite: "Complex-instruction set
computer", not "more-instructions computer".

>I always thought it should have been "IRSC": "Increased Register Set 
>Computer". The most obvious characteristic, the one that tends to hit you 
>first, is having lots of registers.

Having 32 GPRs does not make AMD64 with APX a RISC, and VAX (a CISC)
has the same number of registers as the first 801 and the ARM A32/T32
(RISCs).

However, in John Mashey's criteria the number of registers plays a
role; he requires >4 bits for the GPR specifier, and >3 bits for the
FPR specifier.

- anton
-- 
'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.'
  Mitch Alsup, <c17fcd89-f024-40e7-a594-88a85ac10d20o@googlegroups.com>