| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<20250101.164057.ab2ab323@mixmin.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
From: D <noreply@mixmin.net> Subject: Re: Usenet (was: Re: Royal Back of Canada Phish coming from Google Gmail) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <vib3h8$1h71$30@gallifrey.nk.ca> <20241209111851.f08415575f43bf97d65d8276@inter-corporate.com> <vj7tqt$qma$1@panix2.panix.com> <20241231151740.1a3bb7b5f9fa8858f74d4522@inter-corporate.com> <cone.1735736203.901551.259923.1000@ripper.email-scan.com> Message-Id: <20250101.164057.ab2ab323@mixmin.net> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 16:40:57 +0000 Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!news.karotte.org!news2.arglkargh.de!alphared!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128 Bytes: 1461 Lines: 10 On Wed, 01 Jan 2025 07:56:43 -0500, Sam <sam@email-scan.com> wrote: snip >I don't think its spam and trolls that doomed Usenet. usenet started 45 years ago and remains active, but because most newsgroups are unmoderated, insiders that prefer moderation have never accepted usenet as a viable alternative to their collective "nanny state" comfort zone, and old-fashioned plain text must seem very outdated to the modern day in-crowd with their noses glued to their phones . . . so to them, usenet never "died" because it never lived to begin with, at least not in their jetsetter lives