| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<20250124140605.00004d20@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: C23 on MSVC Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:06:05 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <20250124140605.00004d20@yahoo.com> References: <vmohjl$79d9$1@dont-email.me> <vmp33n$cqs5$2@dont-email.me> <vmup1q$1stl0$1@dont-email.me> <vmvdn6$243si$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 13:06:09 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a3bf6e0363845c200608d71f04f46bf"; logging-data="2334323"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jV7xMOHaH7QuFTGDxoRZDb+CVsWfMMGU=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:hHnPHRQnGvXXRUPnoA3vkeLdj+0= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2235 On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 06:58:47 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 20:06:02 -0500, mjos_examine wrote: > > > On 2025-01-21 4:20 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > > > >> Interesting to compare the different compilers on this chart: > >> > >> <https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/compiler_support/23>. > >> > >> The only one with a solid green column is GCC. MSCV is mostly red. > >> > > > > That chart is inaccurate for MSVC 17.12.4 with /std:clatest. > > For instance, [[fallthrough]] is certainly supported. > > Still leaving MSVC mostly red, is it not? And still the only one with > a solid green column remains GCC. May be, because majority of additions to the Standard were codifying existing gcc practice? BTW, there is nothing wrong with that. In the situation where gcc team is the only capable team interested in further development of C language, it is the most logical outcome. I suppose, MSVC team would appreciate addition of __try/__except/__finally. But since it didn't happen in last 31 years, it is not very likely to happen in the future.