Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20250212101604.00007e92@gmail.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:16:04 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <20250212101604.00007e92@gmail.com> References: <vkjmdg$30kff$1@dont-email.me> <vle8uk$12sii$2@dont-email.me> <c686fb74-4fac-0809-7005-417c76ee0e3b@example.net> <nbReP.633803$oR74.271654@fx16.iad> <NnVeP.44028$vfee.11890@fx45.iad> <vo6ubb$3ue2q$2@dont-email.me> <RhOdnY5Kb8vulDr6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vo7lp6$25uo$2@dont-email.me> <655acbf6-05e5-69ff-8a44-9f7075aafa2e@example.net> <vo8b6g$69pr$2@dont-email.me> <c78ec6bb-5cfb-72f4-3e2d-b9cf13778119@example.net> <slrnvqkhig.1ksd4.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <9RycneStTKjZETf6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> <m0vp8cFmqrtU3@mid.individual.net> <OVydnYztJ_VcQzf6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <m10a1kFpvndU1@mid.individual.net> <Wu2cnQALj-nzazf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <m11levF1o50U1@mid.individual.net> <73idnXWOHfZXYTb6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <m12gi0F6a4tU1@mid.individual.net> <nsucnfEFUK3ihzH6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <m12tbiF83a2U1@mid.individual.net> <il2dnXjUiKHmRDH6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@earthlink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:16:08 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fffcf245ee17c3432c24c991a40e9a2a"; logging-data="2493588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tomZWJsf9nsHWTd+KRhn6zVG0ezXsxcA=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:2p430QqYy5X3N93pw8k4Bog+KCM= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2762 On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 12:25:17 -0500 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > Not entirely sure why CBM crashed and burned. The IBM box changed > public perceptions a bit - and all those nice plug-in slots on the > board were better than the usual CBM approach of cartridges and > serial peripherials. The home game market switched towards dedicated > devices as well. Guess CBM management bought a faulty crystal ball. The writing was probably on the wall for all the smaller players when IBM decided to get into the market (though the clones eventually ate *their* lunch,) but CBM suffered from gross mismanagement verging on straight-up embezzlement in its last years, to boot; very much a fore- runner to a lot of the "looted & pillaged by reaving MBAs" stories of the 21st century :/